Scaffolding collapsed as people climbed to see Ethiopia church mural, eyewitness tells BBC
A tragic incident unfolded yesterday in Lalibela, Ethiopia, where a group of individuals gathered to catch a glimpse of a newly unveiled church mural. Eyewitnesses reported that as people started climbing the scaffolding to get a closer view of the artwork, the structure suddenly gave way, leading to a devastating collapse.
The event took place at the renowned Bete Giyorgis church, a UNESCO World Heritage site known for its historical and cultural significance. The mural in question had drawn considerable attention due to its intricate details and vibrant colors, sparking the interest of many visitors.
According to eyewitnesses, the scaffolding, which was set up for renovation work on the church, could not withstand the weight of the individuals who climbed it. As a result, several people were trapped under the debris, leading to injuries and, tragically, some fatalities.
Local authorities have initiated an investigation into the incident to determine the causes behind the scaffolding’s collapse. They have urged the public to avoid speculation until a thorough examination is conducted.
In the aftermath of the tragedy, concerns have been raised about the safety measures in place at heritage sites and the need for proper maintenance to prevent such accidents from occurring in the future.
The community in Lalibela is in mourning following the loss of lives in this unforeseen event, prompting reflection on the balance between preserving cultural treasures and ensuring visitor safety.
This incident serves as a somber reminder of the importance of upholding safety standards in heritage sites to protect both their invaluable artifacts and the individuals who visit them.
Sources Analysis:
Eyewitnesses – Eyewitnesses are individuals who were present at the scene and observed the events firsthand. While they can provide valuable insights, their accounts may be influenced by personal perceptions and emotions related to the incident.
Local authorities – Local authorities are tasked with investigating the incident and ensuring public safety. Their statements are crucial for understanding the official response to the incident, although they may have specific interests in portraying the situation in a certain light.
Fact Check:
Eyewitness accounts – Unconfirmed claims: While eyewitness testimony is significant, it can be subjective and influenced by individual perspectives.
Authorities initiating an investigation – Verified facts: The local authorities have publicly announced an investigation, which is verifiable through official statements and actions taken post-incident.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Scaffolding collapsed as people climbed to see Ethiopia church mural, eyewitness tells BBC”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.