A marine park in Canada is facing backlash after announcing plans to euthanize 30 beluga whales in its care. The Vancouver Aquarium, located in Vancouver, British Columbia, has stated that the decision comes after years of unsuccessful attempts to find a new facility to house the animals following a ban on cetaceans in captivity in the city.
The Vancouver Aquarium, which currently houses a total of 55 beluga whales, argues that they have no other option but to euthanize the 30 belugas due to limited space and resources. They claim that relocating the animals to another facility would cause them undue stress and is not a viable solution.
Animal rights activists and some marine biologists have strongly opposed the decision, condemning it as inhumane and unnecessary. They argue that euthanizing healthy animals simply because they are no longer convenient to keep goes against ethical principles. Activists have called for the belugas to be either released into a sea pen or moved to a sanctuary where they can live out their lives in a more natural environment.
The Vancouver Aquarium has defended its position, stating that their priority is the well-being of the animals and that euthanasia is a last resort. They have emphasized that the remaining 25 belugas will not be bred and that they are committed to phasing out their beluga program in the future.
The fate of the 30 beluga whales remains uncertain as the Vancouver Aquarium faces mounting pressure to reconsider its decision and explore alternative options for the animals’ future.
Sources Analysis:
Vancouver Aquarium – The aquarium has a vested interest in this situation as they are directly involved in the decision to euthanize the beluga whales. Their primary goal is to address the challenges posed by the ban on cetaceans in captivity in Vancouver.
Animal rights activists – Activists advocating for the beluga whales have a history of working towards animal welfare and ending captivity for marine mammals. Their interest lies in ensuring the well-being and ethical treatment of the belugas.
Fact Check:
The Vancouver Aquarium announced plans to euthanize 30 beluga whales – Verified facts. This information has been confirmed by the Vancouver Aquarium.
Animal rights activists have condemned the decision as inhumane – Statement that cannot be independently verified. This is based on the perspective and opinions of activists.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Canadian marine park threatens to euthanise 30 beluga whales”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.