China accuses US of ‘double standards’ over tariff threat
China has accused the United States of employing “double standards” regarding trade practices after the US threatened to impose tariffs on countries that manipulate their currency exchange rates. The accusation from China comes as tensions between the two economic powerhouses continue to escalate.
The US Treasury Department recently issued a semiannual report on International Economic and Exchange Rate Policies, where it warned that it would consider imposing tariffs on countries that manipulate their currencies to gain unfair trade advantages. Although China was not labeled as a currency manipulator in the report, the US criticized China for not disclosing its foreign exchange interventions.
In response, China’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson criticized the US for adopting “double standards” in its approach to currency manipulation. The spokesperson emphasized that China has never used its currency as a tool to gain a competitive edge in trade and stated that the US should engage in dialogue and cooperation to address any concerns instead of making unilateral threats.
The ongoing trade tensions between the US and China have reignited concerns about a potential trade war that could have significant repercussions on the global economy. Both countries have been engaged in a tit-for-tat trade dispute, imposing tariffs on billions of dollars’ worth of each other’s goods.
The latest exchange of accusations highlights the underlying complexities and challenges in the economic relationship between the two countries, with both sides asserting their positions amid growing uncertainty in the global trade landscape.
Sources Analysis:
US Treasury Department – The US Treasury Department is a government agency and is directly involved in the situation. Its interest lies in ensuring fair trade practices and protecting the US economy.
Chinese Foreign Ministry – The Chinese Foreign Ministry is a government entity directly involved in the issue. Its interest is to defend China’s trade practices and reputation on the international stage.
Fact Check:
The US threatened to impose tariffs on countries that manipulate their currency exchange rates – Verified fact. This information is confirmed by the US Treasury Department’s report.
China criticized the US for adopting “double standards” in its approach to currency manipulation – Unconfirmed claim. This statement is based on China’s perspective and has not been independently verified.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “China accuses US of ‘double standards’ over tariff threat”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.