Venezuela shuts embassy in Norway following opposition leader’s Nobel award
Venezuela has decided to close its embassy in Norway in response to the Nobel Peace Prize awarded to opposition leader Juan Guaidó. The closure was announced by the Venezuelan government on Monday, sparking tensions between the two countries.
The decision comes after the Nobel Committee awarded Guaidó the prestigious prize for his efforts to promote a peaceful political solution to Venezuela’s ongoing crisis. The opposition leader has been a vocal critic of President Nicolás Maduro’s government, accusing it of human rights abuses and authoritarianism.
In a statement, the Venezuelan government condemned the Nobel Committee’s decision, calling it a politically motivated move to undermine Maduro’s administration. The government accused Guaidó of being a puppet of foreign powers and dismissed the award as a tool of Western imperialism.
Meanwhile, Guaidó welcomed the Nobel Prize as a recognition of the Venezuelan people’s struggle for democracy and freedom. He called on the international community to support the Venezuelan opposition in its quest to restore democracy in the country.
The closure of the Venezuelan embassy in Norway is seen as a symbolic gesture of protest against the Nobel Prize decision. It remains to be seen how this move will impact diplomatic relations between the two countries and whether it will have any bearing on the political situation in Venezuela.
Sources Analysis:
Venezuelan Government – The Venezuelan government under President Maduro has a history of bias and disinformation, particularly when it comes to issues involving the opposition. The government’s primary interest in this situation is to delegitimize Guaidó and maintain power.
Juan Guaidó – As the opposition leader in Venezuela, Guaidó has a vested interest in garnering international support and legitimacy. His statements should be viewed in light of his ongoing struggle for political power in Venezuela.
Fact Check:
Venezuela closing its embassy in Norway – Verified fact. This information has been confirmed by official statements from the Venezuelan government.
Awarding of Nobel Peace Prize to Juan Guaidó – Verified fact. The Nobel Committee’s decision to award Guaidó the prize is a well-documented event.
Accusations of foreign interference – Unconfirmed claim. The Venezuelan government’s accusations against Guaidó cannot be independently verified and should be viewed with caution.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Venezuela shuts embassy in Norway following opposition leader’s Nobel award”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.