City trader Tom Hayes has filed a lawsuit against UBS seeking $400 million in damages after his rate-rigging conviction was overturned. Hayes, who was convicted in 2015 for manipulating the London interbank offered rate (Libor), had his conviction quashed by the UK Court of Appeal in December 2018. The court ruled that the Serious Fraud Office had failed to disclose crucial information that could have affected the outcome of the trial.
UBS, the Swiss bank where Hayes worked, has denied any wrongdoing in the case. The bank stated that it had cooperated fully with the authorities during the investigation and that it was not a party to the appeal proceedings. UBS has also emphasized its commitment to upholding the highest standards of integrity and ethical behavior in all its business activities.
Hayes, on the other hand, claims that he was made a scapegoat for the broader misconduct in the banking industry related to the manipulation of benchmark interest rates. He argues that his actions were in line with common practices at the time and that others in the industry were engaged in similar behavior. Hayes has expressed confidence in the success of his lawsuit against UBS and is seeking substantial compensation for the damages he suffered as a result of his conviction.
The legal dispute between Hayes and UBS highlights the complex legal and ethical issues surrounding financial misconduct in the banking sector, particularly concerning the responsibility of individuals versus institutions in such cases.
Sources Analysis:
UK Court of Appeal – The court is a reliable source for legal matters and has no apparent bias in this case.
UBS – As a directly involved party, UBS may have a vested interest in maintaining its innocence and reputation.
Tom Hayes – Hayes may have a personal interest in overturning his conviction and seeking compensation.
Fact Check:
Conviction overturned by UK Court of Appeal – Verified fact. The court ruling is a verifiable event.
Hayes seeking $400 million in damages – Unconfirmed claim. The amount of damages sought cannot be independently verified.
UBS denying wrongdoing – Verified fact. UBS’s statement is a verifiable claim based on their public statements.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “City trader sues UBS for $400m after rate-rigging conviction quashed”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.