Tit-for-tat tariffs, a shaky truce and turmoil: How we got to the Trump-Xi meeting
In a series of escalating tit-for-tat tariffs, the United States and China have engaged in a trade war that has shook the global economy. The dispute, which started back in 2018, stemmed from the Trump administration’s allegations of unfair trade practices by China, including intellectual property theft and forced technology transfers. In response, the U.S. imposed tariffs on billions of dollars worth of Chinese goods, prompting China to retaliate with tariffs of its own on U.S. products.
The trade tensions between the two economic powerhouses have caused uncertainty in financial markets worldwide, with fears of a broader impact on global trade. Efforts to reach a resolution have been made in the past, including a temporary truce agreed upon by President Trump and President Xi Jinping during the G20 summit in June 2019. However, subsequent negotiations failed to produce a lasting agreement, leading to further escalation of tariffs.
As the trade dispute continued to intensify, both countries experienced economic repercussions, with sectors such as agriculture and manufacturing bearing the brunt of the tariffs. The uncertainty surrounding the trade war has also weighed on business investments, affecting businesses on both sides of the Pacific.
The upcoming meeting between President Trump and President Xi at the G20 summit in Osaka, Japan, is highly anticipated as a potential turning point in the trade conflict. Both leaders have expressed their willingness to resume negotiations, raising hopes for a possible resolution that could de-escalate tensions and stabilize the global economy.
While the outcome of the Trump-Xi meeting remains uncertain, the stakes are high for both countries and the international community, as the decisions made in Osaka could have far-reaching implications for trade relations and economic stability.
Sources Analysis:
Source 1 – Experts with knowledge of international trade
Analysis: This source is likely to provide a balanced perspective on the trade war, focusing on economic implications rather than political biases.
Source 2 – Chinese state media
Analysis: This source tends to align with the Chinese government’s official stance, potentially presenting a one-sided view of the trade conflict.
Fact Check:
Fact 1 – Verified fact: The trade dispute between the U.S. and China started in 2018.
Fact 2 – Verified fact: The U.S. imposed tariffs on Chinese goods.
Fact 3 – Unconfirmed claim: The negotiations between the U.S. and China failed to produce a lasting agreement due to specific demands from both parties.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Tit-for-tat tariffs, a shaky truce and turmoil: How we got to the Trump-Xi meeting”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.