More people using family help than Buy Now Pay Later loans
Recent data analysis has revealed that a growing number of people are turning to family help rather than Buy Now Pay Later (BNPL) loans for financial assistance. The study, conducted by a financial research firm, found that in the last six months, 65% of individuals seeking financial aid opted to borrow money from family members, while only 35% chose to utilize BNPL services.
The findings indicate a shift in borrowing preferences among consumers, with a notable increase in those prioritizing familial support over alternative lending options. Experts attribute this trend to the desire for more personalized repayment terms and the avoidance of potential high-interest rates associated with BNPL loans.
In response to these findings, a spokesperson for a prominent BNPL provider emphasized the importance of transparency and consumer education regarding their services. The company highlighted its commitment to responsible lending practices and stated that they continue to offer flexible repayment options to accommodate their customers’ diverse needs.
Conversely, family members who have been assisting their loved ones financially expressed satisfaction in being able to provide support during challenging times. Many cited the opportunity to help without the burden of interest rates or strict repayment deadlines as a significant advantage of intra-family borrowing.
As the financial landscape continues to evolve, the choice between seeking assistance from family members or engaging with BNPL services remains a personal decision for individuals in need of financial support. With both options offering distinct advantages, consumers are encouraged to assess their preferences carefully to make informed choices aligned with their financial goals and circumstances.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “More people using family help than Buy Now Pay Later loans”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.