Former US Vice-President Dick Cheney, a key figure in the “war on terror” following the September 11, 2001 attacks, has been under scrutiny for his involvement in shaping the US response to terrorism. Cheney, who served as vice president from 2001 to 2009 under President George W. Bush, played a significant role in advocating for the invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 and Iraq in 2003.
Critics argue that Cheney’s hawkish stance and support for controversial policies such as waterboarding and the use of enhanced interrogation techniques violated human rights and international law. They accuse him of promoting a narrative that justified the expansion of executive powers and the erosion of civil liberties in the name of national security.
Cheney and his supporters, however, defend his actions as necessary measures to protect the country from further terrorist attacks. They credit the “war on terror” policies, including the establishment of the Department of Homeland Security and the implementation of the Patriot Act, with preventing another large-scale attack on US soil.
Since leaving office, Cheney has remained a vocal advocate for a robust national security posture and a critic of what he perceives as weakening US defenses. His continued influence within the Republican Party ensures that his perspectives on counterterrorism efforts and national security will continue to shape political discourse in the United States.
The legacy of Dick Cheney as a key architect of the US response to the “war on terror” remains a topic of debate and reflection, with his detractors condemning his methods as excessive and immoral, while his supporters laud his commitment to keeping America safe in a dangerous world.
Sources Analysis:
1. The New York Times – Known for its center-left editorial stance, which may influence its coverage of Cheney and the “war on terror.” The outlet has reported critically on Cheney’s policies in the past.
2. Fox News – Considered to have a conservative bias and has been supportive of Cheney and his actions during the “war on terror.” The network’s coverage may be favorable towards him.
Fact Check:
1. Dick Cheney served as US Vice-President from 2001 to 2009 – Verified facts. This information can be easily confirmed through official records.
2. Critics accuse Cheney of supporting controversial policies such as waterboarding – Unconfirmed claims. While there is evidence of Cheney’s support for enhanced interrogation techniques, the specific accusation of waterboarding would require further verification.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Dick Cheney: Former US vice-president who helped lead ‘war on terror'”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.