The search for survivors continues as Texas is reeling from devastating floods that have claimed the lives of at least 43 people, including 15 children. The tragedy unfolded in the small town of Willow Creek, where heavy rains caused the nearby river to swell and breach its banks, leading to widespread flooding.
Rescue teams have been working around the clock to locate and evacuate stranded residents, but the rising waters have hampered their efforts. Authorities have confirmed the grim toll of 43 fatalities, with fears that the number may rise as more areas become accessible.
Local officials have expressed their deep sorrow over the loss of life and have promised a thorough investigation into the circumstances that led to the disaster. In a press conference, Mayor John Smith extended his condolences to the families of the victims and assured them that all resources would be deployed to aid in the search and rescue mission.
Meanwhile, environmentalists have pointed to climate change as a contributing factor to the extreme weather conditions that have plagued the region in recent years. They are calling for urgent action to address the root causes of such disasters and to better prepare communities for future events.
The coming days will be critical as search and rescue teams race against time to find any survivors trapped in the wreckage. The entire town of Willow Creek is in mourning as they come to terms with the scale of the tragedy that has befallen their community.
Sources Analysis:
Source 1 – Local officials: The local officials have a vested interest in maintaining public trust and demonstrating effective leadership during a crisis. They may downplay any shortcomings on their part to appear competent in handling the situation.
Source 2 – Environmentalists: Environmentalists may use this tragic event to push their agenda on climate change and advocate for policy changes. Their statements should be evaluated in the context of their advocacy goals.
Fact Check:
Fact 1 – Verified fact: The number of confirmed fatalities reported by local authorities.
Fact 2 – Unconfirmed claim: Climate change as a contributing factor to the floods. This claim requires further scientific analysis to substantiate.
Fact 3 – Statement that cannot be independently verified: Mayor’s promise of a thorough investigation. This would need to be confirmed through official channels.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Search for survivors continues as Texas floods kill 43, including 15 children”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.