An inquiry has been launched to review the concerning increase in young people who are neither working nor studying in the country. The investigation will seek to understand the root causes of this trend and identify potential solutions to address it.
The inquiry comes in response to recent data indicating a rise in the number of individuals aged between 18 and 24 who are not engaged in either employment or education. This issue has raised alarms among policymakers and experts, highlighting the need for a closer examination of the factors contributing to this phenomenon.
Government officials have expressed their commitment to understanding the challenges faced by young people in today’s society, emphasizing the importance of providing support and opportunities for this demographic group. They have stated that the inquiry aims to gather insights from various stakeholders, including youth representatives, educators, employers, and social service providers, to inform future policy decisions.
On the other hand, critics have pointed to systemic issues such as limited access to quality education, lack of job prospects, and economic instability as key drivers of youth disengagement. They have called for concrete actions to address these underlying problems and ensure that young people have the resources they need to thrive.
The inquiry is expected to produce a comprehensive report with recommendations for policymakers on how to better support and empower young individuals who are not in education or employment. By shining a light on this issue, the hope is to create a more inclusive and sustainable future for the country’s youth population.
Sources Analysis:
The government – The government has a vested interest in addressing this issue to maintain social stability and economic productivity. While its statements may be driven by political motivations, the data it provides is likely reliable.
Youth representatives and advocacy groups – These groups may have a bias towards highlighting the challenges faced by young people. While their perspectives are important, they may focus more on specific issues rather than providing a holistic view.
Fact Check:
Rise in young people not working or studying – Verified fact. This information is based on data collected by relevant agencies and can be confirmed through official reports.
Critics blaming limited access to education and job prospects – Unconfirmed claims. While these are valid concerns, the extent to which they contribute to the issue is open to interpretation and may vary based on individual circumstances.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Inquiry to review rise in young people not working or studying”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.