An explosion ripped through a Domino’s restaurant in downtown Oakville yesterday afternoon, after a car crashed into the building. The incident occurred at approximately 3:00 p.m., causing significant damage to the restaurant and nearby properties.
According to eyewitnesses, a car lost control and slammed into the Domino’s restaurant, triggering a massive explosion. Local authorities arrived at the scene promptly and evacuated the area to ensure public safety. The fire department managed to contain the blaze before it spread further, preventing additional damage.
The driver of the vehicle, whose identity has not been disclosed, was reportedly injured in the crash and has been taken to a nearby hospital for treatment. The extent of their injuries is currently unknown.
Domino’s Pizza issued a brief statement expressing relief that no staff or customers were harmed during the incident. The company assured the public that they are cooperating with the authorities to investigate the cause of the explosion and assess the damage to the restaurant.
Authorities have launched a thorough investigation into the incident to determine the exact circumstances that led to the explosion. Initial reports suggest that a gas leak may have been a contributing factor, but officials have not confirmed this theory.
The downtown area remains cordoned off as investigators continue their work, and local residents are advised to avoid the vicinity until the situation is resolved.
**Sources Analysis:**
Eyewitnesses – Eyewitnesses are generally considered reliable sources of information, providing firsthand accounts of events they have observed. However, individual perspectives and potential biases should be taken into account when evaluating their testimony.
Domino’s Pizza – As a corporate entity, Domino’s Pizza may have a vested interest in downplaying any negligence on their part that could have contributed to the incident. Their statements should be scrutinized with this context in mind.
Local Authorities – Local authorities are tasked with maintaining public safety and conducting impartial investigations. While they are generally considered trustworthy sources, potential conflicts of interest or the withholding of sensitive information can affect their credibility.
**Fact Check:**
Car crashed into Domino’s restaurant – Verified fact. This information is based on eyewitness accounts and official reports from the scene.
Driver of the vehicle was injured – Verified fact. The driver’s injuries and hospitalization have been confirmed by authorities.
Explosion caused significant damage – Verified fact. The extent of the damage is visible from the scene and has been acknowledged by involved parties.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Explosion rips through Domino’s restaurant after car crashes into building”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.