A marine biologist was bitten in the head by a shark, but he now hopes to meet the animal again, revealing it may have saved his life. The incident occurred off the coast of the Bahamas on a routine dive to study marine life. Marine biologist Dr. Jonathan W. was examining a group of reef sharks when one suddenly attacked him, biting his head and pulling him underwater. Despite the traumatic experience, Dr. Jonathan believes the shark may have actually saved his life by acting as a distraction before a more dangerous tiger shark approached.
Dr. Jonathan has expressed a desire to reunite with the shark that attacked him, hoping to further study its behavior and possibly form a connection with the animal. He acknowledges the risks involved but remains intrigued by the shark’s actions during the incident. His colleagues have shown support for his unconventional idea, emphasizing the potential for valuable research and insight into shark behavior.
The incident has sparked discussions among the scientific community about the complex nature of shark behavior and interactions with humans. Some experts caution against anthropomorphizing the shark’s actions, highlighting the inherent risks of interacting closely with wild animals. Others see Dr. Jonathan’s perspective as a unique opportunity to deepen understanding of shark behavior and promote conservation efforts.
The biologist’s story has gained international attention, with many expressing admiration for his courage and curiosity following such a harrowing experience. While the idea of seeking out the shark that attacked him may seem unusual to some, Dr. Jonathan remains steadfast in his belief that there is more to learn from these creatures than meets the eye.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “‘This animal spared my life’: Biologist bitten in head by shark hopes to meet it again”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.