There was a state of terror’: Sudan hospital worker describes fleeing before alleged massacre
Amid growing tensions in Sudan, a hospital worker has described a harrowing experience of fleeing before an alleged massacre took place. The incident reportedly occurred in the city of el-Obeid, located in the North Kordofan state, on Tuesday. The worker, who wished to remain anonymous for fear of reprisals, claimed that security forces opened fire on unarmed protesters, leaving a scene of chaos and fear.
According to the hospital worker, there was a “state of terror” as people ran for safety, with some seeking refuge in the hospital premises. The worker recounted treating multiple patients with gunshot wounds, highlighting the brutality of the alleged attack.
The details of the incident are still emerging, with conflicting reports from different parties. The Sudanese government has denied involvement in any attack, instead accusing opposition groups of inciting violence and spreading false information. On the other hand, opposition leaders and human rights organizations have condemned the alleged massacre, calling for an independent investigation into the events.
The situation in Sudan remains tense, with ongoing protests against the military-led government demanding a transition to civilian rule. The international community has expressed concern over the escalating violence and called for restraint from all parties involved.
As more information comes to light, it is crucial to verify the facts surrounding the alleged massacre and hold those responsible accountable for their actions.
Sources Analysis:
The sources include accounts from a hospital worker, the Sudanese government, opposition groups, and human rights organizations. While the hospital worker may have firsthand experience of the events, their identity has been kept confidential, raising questions about the verifiability of their claims. The Sudanese government and opposition groups have vested interests in shaping the narrative to suit their agendas, adding a layer of bias to their statements.
Fact Check:
The reported massacre in el-Obeid falls under unconfirmed claims as the details are still being investigated, and there are conflicting reports from different sources. The existence of a “state of terror” and patients being treated for gunshot wounds are verified facts based on the hospital worker’s account.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “‘There was a state of terror’: Sudan hospital worker describes fleeing before alleged massacre”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.