Arsenal’s forward, Alex Iwobi, recently praised his teammate Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang, describing his aura as amazing. Iwobi highlighted Aubameyang’s positive influence on the team both on and off the pitch. The statement was made during an interview after a training session at Arsenal’s training ground in London. Iwobi credited Aubameyang for his leadership qualities and his ability to inspire and motivate the team.
Sources Analysis:
Interview with Alex Iwobi – Alex Iwobi is a current player at Arsenal and has a direct involvement in the team. His statement about Aubameyang might be biased due to their close working relationship, and his positive comments could serve the interests of promoting team unity and motivation.
Fact Check:
The fact that Alex Iwobi praised Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang’s aura – Verified fact. This statement was directly reported from the interview with Iwobi.
The fact that Iwobi highlighted Aubameyang’s positive influence on the team – Verified fact. This information was presented in the interview with Iwobi and can be confirmed.
The fact that the statement was made during an interview at Arsenal’s training ground in London – Verified fact. The location and context of the interview were clearly mentioned.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “‘His aura is amazing’ – Iwobi on Aubameyang”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.