Sheikh Hasina: The pro-democracy icon who became an autocrat
Bangladesh’s Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, once hailed as a pro-democracy icon, is now facing criticism for her increasingly autocratic rule. The daughter of the country’s founding leader, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, Hasina has been in power since 2009 and won a fourth consecutive term in the controversial 2018 elections.
Critics accuse Hasina of cracking down on dissent, restricting freedom of speech, and intimidating the opposition. In recent years, there have been numerous reports of journalists, activists, and political opponents being arrested or disappearing under mysterious circumstances. Hasina’s government has also been accused of manipulating the judiciary to target its critics.
Hasina’s supporters argue that she has brought stability and economic growth to Bangladesh during her tenure. They credit her with improving infrastructure, reducing poverty, and promoting women’s rights in the country. Hasina’s Awami League party maintains that the government is committed to upholding democracy and that it has been elected by the will of the people.
The international community has expressed concerns about the state of democracy in Bangladesh under Hasina’s leadership. Organizations such as Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International have raised alarm about the shrinking space for dissent and political opposition in the country. Western democracies have called on Hasina to ensure free and fair elections and respect for human rights.
As Sheikh Hasina navigates the delicate balance between maintaining power and upholding democratic principles, the future of Bangladesh’s democracy hangs in the balance.
Sources Analysis:
Source 1 – Human Rights Watch: The organization has a history of advocating for human rights globally. In this specific case, the source may have a bias against Sheikh Hasina’s government due to reported human rights violations.
Source 2 – Awami League Party: As the ruling party in Bangladesh, the Awami League has a vested interest in portraying Sheikh Hasina’s government in a positive light. The source may downplay any accusations of autocracy or human rights abuses.
Fact Check:
Fact 1 – Sheikh Hasina has been in power since 2009 – Verified facts, this information can be easily verified through official records.
Fact 2 – Critics accuse Hasina of cracking down on dissent – Unconfirmed claims, as this accusation is based on reports and allegations that may not have been proven in a court of law.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Sheikh Hasina: The pro-democracy icon who became an autocrat”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.