The US House is expected to approve a resolution that seeks to release files related to the late financier Jeffrey Epstein, who was facing charges of sex trafficking before his death in 2019. The resolution, proposed by Representative Al Green, calls for the release of all information, records, and evidence related to Epstein and his associates.
The move comes after years of speculation and conspiracy theories surrounding Epstein’s connections to powerful figures in politics, business, and entertainment. Many believe that releasing the files could shed light on the extent of Epstein’s network and potentially reveal new information about his alleged crimes.
Supporters of the resolution argue that transparency is crucial in bringing justice to Epstein’s victims and holding accountable those who may have been complicit in his actions. They believe that the public has a right to know the full truth about what transpired in Epstein’s case.
On the other hand, some critics express concerns about privacy issues and the potential harm that releasing the files could cause to individuals who may be mentioned in the documents. They suggest that redactions should be made to protect the identities of innocent parties and prevent any unwarranted damage to reputations.
The resolution is expected to spark a heated debate in the House, with lawmakers on both sides presenting their arguments for and against its passage. Regardless of the outcome, the decision will undoubtedly have far-reaching implications for how the Epstein case is remembered and whether further investigations are pursued.
The approval of the resolution would signify a significant step towards unraveling the mysteries surrounding Epstein’s life and alleged crimes, bringing a renewed focus on the quest for truth and accountability in one of the most high-profile criminal cases in recent memory.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “US House expected to approve resolution to release Epstein files”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.