‘We worry more about food’ say Venezuelans living under threat of US military action
Venezuelans living under the cloud of potential US military action express their concerns about the impact it would have on their daily lives, with a particular focus on food security. The situation has escalated recently with the arrival of US warships in the Caribbean region, heightening fears of possible intervention.
The Venezuelan government led by President Nicolás Maduro has strongly condemned the US military presence, labeling it as a threat to regional stability. Maduro has accused the US of seeking to interfere in Venezuela’s internal affairs and has called on the international community to reject any interventionist actions by the United States.
On the other hand, the Trump administration has repeatedly stated that all options are on the table concerning Venezuela, including military action. US officials argue that the Maduro government has undermined democracy and violated human rights, creating a humanitarian crisis that requires urgent attention.
Despite the political rhetoric on both sides, Venezuelans on the ground are more concerned about meeting their basic needs, especially food. The country is already facing severe shortages of essential goods due to economic instability and international sanctions. The looming threat of military conflict only exacerbates the struggles of ordinary citizens trying to survive in a deeply troubled economy.
As tensions continue to rise between the US and Venezuela, the focus remains on the potential consequences for the Venezuelan population, who are already grappling with a dire humanitarian situation exacerbated by the threat of external military intervention.
Sources Analysis:
– Venezuelan government: The government led by President Maduro has a history of bias in portraying the US as a threat to justify its own actions. The government’s interest lies in consolidating power and deflecting attention from domestic issues.
– US administration: The Trump administration has been vocal about its support for regime change in Venezuela. The US government’s goal is to oust Maduro and promote a government aligned with US interests in the region.
Fact Check:
– Venezuelans expressing worries about food security – Verified facts; The concerns of Venezuelans about food scarcity are well-documented and supported by various reports and studies.
– US officials considering military action against Venezuela – Verified facts; The US government has openly discussed the possibility of military intervention in Venezuela as part of its foreign policy approach.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “‘We worry more about food’ say Venezuelans living under threat of US military action”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.