The G20 summit in South Africa has concluded amidst notable absence, as the United States boycotted the event. The annual gathering of the world’s major economies took place in Johannesburg over the past three days, with discussions focused on global economic challenges, climate change, and the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.
The decision by the United States to boycott the summit was a significant development, with American officials citing concerns over the summit’s agenda and the lack of emphasis on critical issues such as trade and security. The U.S. delegation’s absence was conspicuous during key discussions on economic recovery strategies post-pandemic and sustainable development goals.
In response to the U.S. boycott, South African officials expressed disappointment but reaffirmed their commitment to advancing discussions within the G20 framework. President Ramaphosa stressed the importance of multilateral cooperation in addressing global challenges and called for unity among G20 members.
Other participating countries, including China, the European Union, and Brazil, emphasized the need for collective action and cooperation to tackle shared problems effectively. Leaders expressed hope for continued dialogue and collaboration despite the absence of the United States.
The boycott by the U.S. raises concerns about the future of international cooperation and consensus-building on critical issues. It underscores the challenges of navigating differing priorities among G20 members and the impact of such decisions on global governance.
The G20 summit’s outcomes and declarations reflect a range of perspectives and priorities, highlighting both areas of agreement and divergence among the world’s major economies. The discussions in Johannesburg have set the stage for ongoing dialogue and cooperation on pressing global issues, even as the absence of the United States looms large over the proceedings.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “G20 summit boycotted by US closes in South Africa”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.