The fallout from a leaked video showing military officers discussing the refusal to follow “illegal orders” has intensified the battle between Republicans and Democrats over the issue of US patriotism. The video, filmed during a training session at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, shows officers questioning the legality of orders to target American citizens in the hypothetical scenario of civil unrest. The military has confirmed the authenticity of the video but has not commented further.
Republicans have criticized the leak, with some calling it a breach of national security and an attempt to undermine the military. They argue that questioning orders undermines the chain of command and the principle of obedience in the military. Democrats, on the other hand, have praised the officers for upholding their duty to the Constitution and the rule of law. They believe that the video highlights the importance of ethical conduct within the military and the need to prevent abuses of power.
The leaked video has reignited the debate over what constitutes true patriotism and loyalty to the country. Republicans view loyalty as following orders without question to ensure national security, while Democrats see loyalty as upholding the values and principles enshrined in the Constitution, even if it means challenging authority.
The incident has underscored the deepening political divide in the US, with each party steadfast in their beliefs about the role of the military and the limits of governmental authority. The repercussions of the video are likely to reverberate in the political arena for some time, further polarizing opinions on patriotism, loyalty, and the rule of law.
The military has launched an investigation into the leak, aiming to identify the source of the video and any potential security breaches. The officers in the video have not been publicly identified, and it remains unclear what consequences they may face for their remarks.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Fallout from ‘illegal orders’ video escalates battle with Democrats over US patriotism”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.