The European Union has launched an investigation into Google over the use of AI-generated summaries in its search results. This move follows concerns that Google’s practices may be anti-competitive and could potentially harm consumers.
The investigation aims to determine whether Google’s use of AI-generated content from third-party websites in the form of short summaries displayed in search results without the website owner’s consent is in violation of EU competition rules. This practice has raised questions about the potential impact on user traffic to the original websites.
Google has defended its use of AI-generated content, stating that it provides users with valuable information and helps drive traffic to websites. The tech giant argues that these summaries are a way to improve the search experience for users by providing relevant information directly on the search results page.
On the other hand, critics, including some website owners and competitors, have raised concerns that Google’s practices could undermine the traffic to original sources by offering information directly on its platform. They claim that this could have a negative impact on publishers and the wider online ecosystem.
The outcome of the EU investigation could have significant implications for Google’s search practices and the broader digital landscape. It remains to be seen how the tech giant will navigate these challenges and whether any regulatory action will be taken to address the concerns raised.
The investigation is part of the EU’s broader efforts to ensure fair competition in the digital market and protect the interests of consumers and businesses. Google’s response to the investigation and the findings that emerge will be closely watched by industry observers and regulatory authorities alike.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “EU investigates Google over AI-generated summaries in search results”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.