In Australia, a group of teenagers has been banned from social media platforms due to concerns about the impact of online content on their mental health. The ban was imposed by their parents, who expressed worries about the excessive time spent on social media and the potential negative effects on their well-being.
The teenagers, on the other hand, feel that the ban is unfair and insulting. They argue that they are capable of managing their social media use responsibly and that cutting them off from these platforms is an unnecessary intrusion into their lives. Some of them have even started a petition to lift the ban, emphasizing their right to make their own choices regarding social media.
The parents, however, stand firm in their decision, citing studies that link excessive social media use to increased levels of anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues among teenagers. They believe that imposing limits on social media can help protect their children from these potential harms and promote healthier habits.
This situation highlights the ongoing debate around the influence of social media on young people’s mental health and the role of parents in setting boundaries for their children’s online activities. While the teenagers advocate for more autonomy and trust in their ability to navigate the digital world, their parents prioritize their well-being and seek to mitigate any risks associated with excessive social media use.
As discussions continue within the families involved, the broader question remains about finding a balance between freedom and protection in the digital age, especially when it comes to the vulnerable demographic of teenagers.
Sources Analysis:
Parents – It can be assumed that the parents have a vested interest in their children’s well-being and may have a bias towards protecting them from potential harm.
Teenagers – The teenagers are directly affected by the ban and may have a bias towards wanting more freedom in their social media use.
Fact Check:
The concerns about the impact of social media on mental health – Unconfirmed claims. While studies have suggested a correlation between social media use and mental health issues, the direct causation is still a topic of debate within the scientific community.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “‘It’s insulting they think we can’t handle it’: The Australian teens banned from social media”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.