‘Person of interest’ detained over Brown University shooting, police say
On Tuesday afternoon, a ‘person of interest’ was apprehended in connection with the shooting incident near Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island. The incident occurred at approximately 10:30 a.m. local time, close to the campus area, and led to a temporary lockdown of the university premises. The individual in custody has not been identified publicly by the authorities.
According to the Providence Police Department, the detained individual is currently undergoing questioning to determine their potential involvement in the shooting. The police have not disclosed any potential motives or details regarding the circumstances of the incident.
Brown University officials have confirmed that the safety alert issued following the shooting has been lifted, allowing normal activities to resume on campus. The university expressed gratitude for the swift response of law enforcement agencies in addressing the situation.
Further information regarding the identity of the detained person, any possible charges, and the specifics of the shooting incident are expected to be released as the investigation progresses.
Sources Analysis:
Providence Police Department: The police department is a reliable source for information on criminal incidents and law enforcement activities but may have an interest in controlling the narrative to maintain public trust and order.
Brown University officials: While the university officials have first-hand knowledge of the events on campus, they may have a vested interest in preserving the reputation and image of the institution.
Fact Check:
Person of interest detained – Verified fact. This information has been publicly confirmed by the police department.
Shooting near Brown University – Verified fact. The location of the incident is a verifiable detail reported by multiple sources.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “‘Person of interest’ detained over Brown University shooting, police say”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.