Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta recently ordered the police to use firearms to shoot protesters in the leg to curb violent demonstrations in the country. The directive came in response to escalating protests by opposition supporters following the arrest of a prominent politician. The president emphasized the need to restore law and order in the face of violent protests that have led to destruction of property and loss of life.
Opposition leaders have condemned the president’s order, labeling it as a violation of human rights. They argue that the use of excessive force against protesters will only inflame tensions and provoke further violence. Human rights organizations have also expressed concerns about the potential for excessive use of force and the need to respect the rights of all individuals, including those participating in protests.
President Kenyatta defended his directive as a necessary measure to protect the country from chaos and ensure the safety of all citizens. He urged protesters to express their grievances through peaceful means and engage in dialogue rather than resorting to violence.
The situation remains tense as both the government and opposition supporters stand their ground, raising fears of further confrontations in the coming days.
Sources Analysis:
1. The Presidency of Kenya – The source has a potential bias in favor of President Kenyatta’s government and policies. It has a vested interest in portraying the president’s actions in a positive light.
2. Opposition Leaders – Opposition leaders may have a bias against President Kenyatta and could be inclined to criticize his directives to gain political advantage.
3. Human Rights Organizations – These organizations might have a bias towards protecting human rights and could highlight any potential violations by the government to serve their mission.
Fact Check:
1. President Kenyatta ordered the police to shoot protesters in the leg – Unconfirmed claim. The veracity of this claim needs further investigation or official confirmation.
2. Opposition leaders condemned the president’s order – Verified fact. This information is based on public statements made by opposition leaders.
3. Human rights organizations expressed concerns about excessive use of force – Verified fact. This statement is based on the known positions and actions of human rights organizations in similar situations.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “‘Shoot in the leg’ – Kenyan leader orders police to curb violent protests”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.