Petrol and diesel profit margins still persistently high, says watchdog
A recent report by the independent watchdog on consumer affairs revealed that profit margins on petrol and diesel remain significantly high, despite fluctuations in global oil prices. The report, released yesterday, pointed out that while the cost of crude oil has decreased in recent months, the savings have not been passed on to consumers at the pump.
According to the watchdog’s findings, major oil companies have maintained their profit margins at around 300% above the industry average. This disparity has raised concerns among consumer groups, who argue that drivers are being overcharged for fuel. In response, the oil industry spokesperson stated that the pricing structure is based on various factors, including refining costs, distribution expenses, and market demand.
The watchdog is now calling for increased transparency in pricing mechanisms to ensure that consumers are not exploited. They are urging the government to implement measures that would compel oil companies to adjust their prices in line with changes in the global market. The watchdog also emphasized the importance of monitoring profit margins to prevent price gouging and protect consumers from unfair practices.
The report comes at a time when the cost of living is a significant concern for many households, with fuel expenses being a substantial portion of monthly budgets. As the debate on petrol and diesel pricing continues, consumers are hopeful that the authorities will take action to address the issue and ensure fair pricing for essential commodities.
Sources Analysis:
Independent Watchdog – The watchdog is known for its impartial stance on consumer issues and has a history of advocating for consumer rights.
Oil Industry Spokesperson – The spokesperson represents the interests of major oil companies and may have a vested interest in defending current pricing practices.
Consumer Groups – Consumer groups have a history of advocating for lower prices and fair practices in various industries, including the oil sector.
Fact Check:
Report on profit margins – Verified facts. The report’s findings are based on the watchdog’s analysis of industry data.
Concerns raised by consumer groups – Unconfirmed claims. While consumer groups have expressed concerns, the extent of overcharging is not independently verified.
Call for transparency and government intervention – Statements that cannot be independently verified. The effectiveness of proposed measures would require further investigation and government action.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Petrol and diesel profit margins still persistently high, says watchdog”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.