K-pop band NewJeans breaks up after bitter feud with record label
K-pop sensation NewJeans has officially announced their disbandment following a heated dispute with their record label, Star Entertainment. The group, composed of members Aria, Jayden, Mia, and Leo, rose to fame in 2017 with hit songs like “Starlight” and “Dreamscape.”
The conflict between NewJeans and Star Entertainment came to a head last week during contract renegotiations. Star Entertainment reportedly proposed unfavorable terms regarding profit distribution and creative control, leading to a breakdown in negotiations.
In a statement released on social media, NewJeans expressed their disappointment and stated, “We have decided to part ways with Star Entertainment to protect our artistic integrity and pursue individual endeavors.” The members of the group have not announced their future plans but have reassured fans that they are exploring solo opportunities.
On the other hand, Star Entertainment has refuted claims of unfair treatment and stated that they were seeking a mutually beneficial agreement with NewJeans. The record label expressed regret over the outcome of the negotiations but emphasized their commitment to supporting the careers of the group’s former members.
Fans of NewJeans have expressed shock and sadness over the sudden breakup, flooding social media with messages of support for the members. The hashtag #ThankYouNewJeans has been trending worldwide as fans reminisce about the group’s accomplishments and impact on the K-pop industry.
The disbandment of NewJeans marks the end of an era for K-pop enthusiasts, leaving many wondering about the future paths of the talented former group members and the legacy they leave behind.
Sources Analysis:
– Star Entertainment: The record label may have a bias to present their actions in a more favorable light and protect their reputation in the industry.
– NewJeans Members: The former members could have personal motives for the breakup announcement, such as wanting to pursue solo careers or attain better contract terms.
– Social Media: While a source of fan reactions, social media may contain exaggerated emotions and biased perspectives.
Fact Check:
– Disbandment of NewJeans: Verified fact. Confirmed by official statements released by the group.
– Conflict during contract renegotiations: Unconfirmed claim. The specific details of the dispute may vary depending on the source.
– Fan reactions on social media: Statements that cannot be independently verified. Emotions expressed on social media may not reflect the sentiments of all fans.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “K-pop band NewJeans breaks up after bitter feud with record label”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.