Two people were killed in clashes between protesters and security forces in Iran yesterday. The violent confrontation took place in the capital city of Tehran on Sunday afternoon. The protesters, reportedly demonstrating against the recent increase in fuel prices, clashed with security forces near a busy street in the city center.
According to eyewitnesses, the situation escalated quickly as protesters started throwing stones and setting fires, while security forces responded with tear gas and batons to disperse the crowd. In the ensuing chaos, two individuals were fatally shot. The identities of the victims have not been disclosed yet.
The Iranian government has issued a statement condemning the violence and asserting that they are committed to maintaining law and order in the country. They have labeled the protesters as agitators seeking to destabilize the nation. On the other hand, the protesters claim they are peacefully exercising their right to dissent against economic hardships imposed by the government.
The clashes in Tehran reflect the ongoing tension between the government and sections of the population dissatisfied with the economic policies and living conditions in Iran. The incident has raised concerns about the potential for further violence and unrest in the country.
Overall, the situation remains tense as authorities are on high alert to prevent any further outbreaks of violence in the capital city.
Sources Analysis:
Eyewitnesses – Eyewitnesses are generally considered reliable sources of firsthand information in breaking news situations like this. However, individual biases or perspectives cannot be completely ruled out.
Government statement – The Iranian government may have a vested interest in portraying the protesters negatively to justify their actions and maintain control. Hence, the statement should be analyzed with caution.
Protesters – The motives of the protesters revolve around airing grievances against economic difficulties, but individual perspectives within the group may vary in terms of their intentions and actions.
Fact Check:
Clashes resulted in two fatalities – Verified facts; The number of casualties can be confirmed through various sources of information.
Protesters were demonstrating against fuel price hikes – Unconfirmed claims; The exact reason behind the protest may vary based on different accounts.
Security forces used tear gas and batons – Verified facts; The use of these crowd control measures can be documented through video footage and witness testimonies.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Two killed in clashes between protesters and security forces in Iran”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.