A Swiss ski bar in the town of Verbier was not inspected for five years before a deadly fire broke out, the mayor of Verbier confirmed. The fire occurred on Sunday evening at the popular apres-ski bar, resulting in the tragic death of two individuals and injuries to several others.
According to the mayor, the ski bar had not undergone a safety inspection for five years due to what he described as administrative oversights. This revelation has raised concerns about the enforcement of safety regulations in public spaces, particularly in popular tourist destinations like Verbier.
The authorities have launched an investigation into the cause of the fire and the safety measures in place at the ski bar. The owner of the establishment has expressed shock and sorrow over the incident, stating that the safety of customers was always a top priority.
The incident has led to calls for stricter safety regulations and more rigorous inspections of public venues to prevent similar tragedies in the future. As the investigation unfolds, the focus remains on determining the cause of the fire and ensuring that necessary safety measures are in place to protect visitors and locals alike in Verbier.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Swiss ski bar not inspected for five years before deadly fire, mayor says”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.