Brazil vows to match US tariffs after Trump threatens 50% levy
Brazil has declared its intention to retaliate against the United States’ potential tariffs on Brazilian steel and aluminum imports after President Trump threatened to impose a 50% levy on these products. The move by the Brazilian government mirrors similar actions taken in the past in response to US trade policies perceived as harmful to Brazilian interests.
The Brazilian Ministry of Economy released a statement confirming that if the US proceeds with the proposed tariffs, Brazil will apply equivalent measures on imports from the United States. This tit-for-tat response aims to protect the Brazilian economy from the negative impacts of increased tariffs on its key exports.
President Trump’s threat of imposing tariffs on Brazilian steel and aluminum comes amidst escalating tensions between the two countries over trade issues. The US has accused Brazil of devaluing its currency to gain an unfair advantage in international trade, a claim that Brazil vehemently denies.
The Brazilian government has emphasized that it is committed to upholding the rules of international trade and will take all necessary actions to defend its economic interests. By signaling its willingness to match US tariffs, Brazil aims to send a strong message that it will not back down in the face of trade pressures.
Both countries have yet to implement the proposed tariffs, leaving room for further negotiations to address their trade disputes. The outcome of these discussions will have significant implications for the economic relationship between Brazil and the United States.
Sources Analysis:
The sources for this article are primarily official statements from the Brazilian Ministry of Economy and President Trump’s comments on potential tariffs. While the Brazilian Ministry of Economy would be inclined to protect Brazilian economic interests, and Trump’s statements may reflect his administration’s trade policy, both could have motives to present their positions in a favorable light.
Fact Check:
Fact 1 – Verified fact: Brazil has declared its intention to retaliate against potential US tariffs.
Fact 2 – Unconfirmed claim: President Trump threatened to impose a 50% levy on Brazilian steel and aluminum imports. This information is based on statements made but has not yet been implemented.
Fact 3 – Verified fact: The US has accused Brazil of devaluing its currency to gain an unfair advantage in international trade.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Brazil vows to match US tariffs after Trump threatens 50% levy”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.