Former chairs of the Federal Reserve have publicly criticized the recently launched criminal investigation into current Fed Chair Jerome Powell. The investigation, initiated by the Department of Justice, is looking into Powell’s communication with top financial executives. It is reported that the probe stems from allegations of improper conduct and potential conflicts of interest on Powell’s part.
Ben Bernanke and Janet Yellen, both former chairs of the Federal Reserve, have condemned the investigation, labeling it as a politically motivated attack that undermines the independence of the central bank. They argue that such actions could have a detrimental impact on the Fed’s ability to make decisions in the best interest of the economy without external pressure or interference.
In response to the criticism, the Department of Justice defended its actions, stating that the investigation is a standard procedure to ensure transparency and accountability within the Federal Reserve. They emphasized that no one, regardless of their position, is above the law, and all allegations must be thoroughly examined to uphold the integrity of the institution.
The criminal investigation into Jerome Powell has raised concerns among monetary policy experts and economists about the potential implications for the Federal Reserve’s autonomy and credibility. The outcome of this probe is awaited with great anticipation, as it could set a significant precedent for the relationship between the central bank and the government in the future.
Sources Analysis:
– The Federal Reserve: The Federal Reserve is directly involved in this situation and has a vested interest in upholding the reputation and independence of the institution.
– Department of Justice: The Department of Justice is a government agency responsible for ensuring compliance with the law and has a motivation to demonstrate the thoroughness of its investigations.
Fact Check:
– Allegations of improper conduct against Jerome Powell – Unconfirmed claims: The specifics of the allegations have not been made public, and their veracity is yet to be determined.
– Ben Bernanke and Janet Yellen criticized the investigation – Verified facts: Both former Fed chairs have publicly expressed their disapproval of the probe and its potential implications.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Former Fed chairs condemn criminal investigation into Jerome Powell”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.