Former Fed chairs condemn criminal investigation into Jerome Powell
Former chairs of the Federal Reserve have spoken out against the criminal investigation into current Fed Chair Jerome Powell, denouncing the move as disruptive and damaging to the independence of the central bank.
The investigation, initiated by the Department of Justice last week, is looking into Powell’s private communications with Wall Street executives during the recent economic downturn. The DOJ alleges that Powell may have provided insider information that could have influenced market decisions.
Ben Bernanke, who led the Fed from 2006 to 2014, stated that “such actions undermine the crucial role of the Federal Reserve in promoting economic stability and growth.” Janet Yellen, Powell’s immediate predecessor, echoed these sentiments, describing the investigation as a “dangerous precedent that could have chilling effects on future Fed chairs.”
On the other hand, supporters of the investigation argue that it is essential to ensure transparency and accountability within the central bank. Some lawmakers have called for a thorough review of Powell’s actions to maintain public trust in the Fed’s operations.
Powell himself has not made any public statements regarding the investigation.
The criminal probe has sparked a debate about the boundaries of the Fed’s independence and the extent to which its officials should be subject to scrutiny. As the investigation unfolds, the implications for the Fed’s credibility and autonomy remain unclear.
Sources Analysis:
Sources in this article include former Fed chairs Ben Bernanke and Janet Yellen, who have a deep understanding of the workings of the Federal Reserve but may have personal biases in defending their institution. The Department of Justice, the initiating body of the investigation, might have political motivations or a desire to ensure accountability in the financial sector.
Fact Check:
– Former Fed chairs spoke out against the investigation: Verified facts. This information can be confirmed through public statements made by Bernanke and Yellen.
– Investigation initiated by the Department of Justice: Verified facts. This information is based on official announcements from the DOJ.
– Allegations of Powell providing insider information: Unconfirmed claims. These claims have not been substantiated with concrete evidence at this time.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Former Fed chairs condemn criminal investigation into Jerome Powell”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.