X to stop Grok AI from undressing images of real people after backlash
X, a prominent tech company specializing in artificial intelligence, has announced that it will cease the feature on its Grok AI platform that allows users to virtually undress images of real people. This decision comes in the wake of significant backlash from the public regarding the ethical implications and potential for misuse of such technology.
The controversial feature, which utilized advanced AI algorithms to create realistic nude images from clothed pictures, raised concerns about consent, privacy, and the perpetuation of non-consensual image sharing. Critics argued that this tool could facilitate cyberbullying, harassment, and the creation of non-consensual pornography.
In response to the mounting criticism, X released a statement acknowledging the feedback and announcing the immediate suspension of the undressing functionality on Grok AI. The company emphasized its commitment to ethical AI development and stated that it would conduct a thorough review of the feature in consultation with experts and stakeholders.
While X initially defended the feature as a demonstration of the platform’s capabilities for research and creativity, the overwhelming negative response prompted a reevaluation of its potential impact. The decision to discontinue the undressing feature reflects X’s responsiveness to public concerns and its recognition of the need to prioritize user well-being and societal values.
As debates surrounding the boundaries of AI technology and ethical considerations continue to evolve, X’s response to the controversy highlights the importance of responsible innovation and the imperative for companies to engage proactively with ethical implications.
Sources Analysis:
X – X is the company involved in developing Grok AI and has a vested interest in its products’ success. The company may aim to balance technological innovation with public perception to maintain a positive brand image.
Public and Critics – Public opinion and critics have expressed concerns about the ethical implications of the undressing feature, focusing on privacy, consent, and the potential for misuse. Their motives include promoting ethical AI development and protecting individuals from harm.
Fact Check:
The decision to stop the undressing feature – Verified facts. X has officially announced the discontinuation of the undressing functionality on Grok AI.
Criticism of the feature for ethical concerns – Unconfirmed claims. While there is evidence of public backlash, the extent of potential misuse of the feature is not definitively proven.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “X to stop Grok AI from undressing images of real people after backlash”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.