South Korea’s former president, Yoon, has been sentenced to five years in jail after attempting to impose martial law in the country. The incident took place in Seoul on Friday, following a failed bid by Yoon which aimed to seize power through a declaration of martial law. Yoon, who served as president from 2017 to 2021, was involved in orchestrating the plan, which ultimately was thwarted by the military who maintained their loyalty to the democratic institutions of the country.
Yoon’s defense team argued that he was acting in the best interest of the nation due to perceived threats to national security and political stability. However, the court ruled that his actions were unconstitutional and a direct threat to the democratic system of South Korea. Yoon himself has not made any public statements following the verdict.
The sentencing of a former president to jail is a significant event in South Korean political history, highlighting the country’s commitment to upholding democratic principles and the rule of law. This verdict sends a strong message that any attempts to undermine democratic institutions will not be tolerated in South Korea.
Various political parties and civil society groups have expressed both support for the verdict and concerns about the implications of a former president being jailed. The ruling party has emphasized the importance of upholding the constitution, while opposition parties have raised questions about the fairness of the trial.
The case has sparked debates across the country about the boundaries of executive power and the balance between national security and democratic values. As South Korea moves forward from this event, it will be crucial to continue safeguarding its democratic institutions and ensuring that such incidents do not occur again in the future.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “S Korea’s ex-president Yoon to be jailed for five years over martial law bid”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.