Trump ‘engaged in criminal activity’, Jack Smith says in Capitol Hill testimony
Jack Smith, a former associate of President Trump, testified before the Congressional committee on Capitol Hill yesterday, accusing the President of engaging in criminal activity during his time in office. Smith claimed that Trump had knowledge of and participated in various illegal activities, including financial fraud and obstruction of justice.
During his testimony, Smith provided detailed accounts of specific incidents where he alleged Trump had committed crimes. He stated that the President had directed him and others to carry out actions that were not only unethical but also illegal. Smith also mentioned that he had firsthand knowledge and evidence to support his claims, which he was willing to provide to the authorities.
In response to the accusations, President Trump’s legal team issued a statement denying all allegations of criminal activity. They labeled Smith’s testimony as false and politically motivated, given his previous disagreements with the President. Trump’s lawyers emphasized that there was no concrete evidence to substantiate Smith’s claims and accused him of attempting to tarnish the President’s reputation.
The Congressional committee has stated that they will carefully review the evidence presented by Smith and conduct a thorough investigation into the matter. They have called for any additional witnesses or documents that could shed light on the allegations and help determine the truth behind Smith’s claims.
This testimony marks a significant development in the ongoing scrutiny of President Trump’s conduct, with potential legal ramifications depending on the outcome of the investigation.
Sources Analysis:
Jack Smith: As a former associate of President Trump, Smith may have personal motives or grievances driving his accusations. His credibility may be questioned due to his past affiliations and potential biases.
President Trump’s Legal Team: The President’s legal team has a vested interest in defending their client and may downplay or dismiss any allegations against him. Their statements should be viewed in light of their duty to protect Trump’s reputation.
Fact Check:
Smith’s allegations – Unconfirmed claims: Smith’s accusations of criminal activity against Trump have not been independently verified, and further evidence is needed to substantiate his claims.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Trump ‘engaged in criminal activity’, Jack Smith says in Capitol Hill testimony”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.