A federal judge has ruled that a lawsuit filed by a group of voice-over artists against a major technology company can move forward. The lawsuit alleges that the company used their voices to create realistic-sounding artificial intelligence (AI) voice clones without their consent.
The judge’s decision allows the voice-over artists to proceed with their claims of unauthorized use of their vocal creations. The lawsuit argues that the AI voice clones created by the technology company could potentially be used in various ways without the artists’ permission, raising concerns about the infringement of their rights and potential loss of income.
The voice-over artists claim that their unique voices are a crucial part of their professional identity and livelihood. They argue that the unauthorized use of their voices in AI technology not only violates their rights but also poses a threat to the integrity of their craft.
On the other hand, the technology company has stated that they believe the lawsuit is without merit and have vowed to defend against the allegations. They argue that the use of AI technology to replicate human voices is a legitimate practice that can bring about innovative solutions in various industries.
The judge’s ruling to allow the lawsuit to proceed signifies a significant development in the case, as it indicates that there is adequate legal basis for the voice-over artists’ claims to be heard in court. The outcome of the lawsuit could have far-reaching implications for the use of AI technology in relation to the rights of individual creators.
The next steps in the legal process will involve further examination of the evidence and arguments presented by both parties as the case moves towards a potential resolution in court. The outcome of this lawsuit could set a precedent for future cases involving the unauthorized use of individuals’ voices in AI technology.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Federal judge says voice-over artists’ AI lawsuit can move forward”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.