South Africa expels Israeli ambassador over diplomatic violations

**What Happened**

South Africa has expelled the Israeli ambassador, Lior Keinan, over what it termed as “violations of diplomatic norms.” The decision was announced by South Africa’s Department of International Relations and Cooperation (DIRCO) on Monday. The expulsion comes in the aftermath of Israel’s deadly military operation in Gaza, which has drawn international condemnation.

South Africa’s DIRCO stated that the decision was made in protest against Israel’s actions in Gaza, which it deemed as a violation of international law and diplomatic protocols. The department accused Israel of employing excessive force against Palestinian civilians and infringing upon their human rights. DIRCO emphasized that the decision to expel the Israeli envoy was a symbolic act of solidarity with the Palestinian people.

In response, Israel’s Foreign Ministry condemned South Africa’s move, labeling it as “racist.” The Israeli government criticized the decision, highlighting that South Africa chose to side with Hamas, the militant group governing Gaza. Israel defended its military operation as a necessary response to the continuous rocket attacks launched by Hamas towards Israeli territory.

The diplomatic rift between the two countries is likely to strain their relations further, with South Africa joining other nations in expressing discontent over Israel’s handling of the situation in Gaza.

**Sources Analysis**

South Africa’s Department of International Relations and Cooperation (DIRCO) – The source appears to be directly involved in the issue and has a clear interest in expressing its position on the matter. It is crucial to consider South Africa’s historical stance on Palestinian rights in evaluating its statements.

Israel’s Foreign Ministry – As a directly involved party in the expulsion of its ambassador, the Israeli Foreign Ministry has a vested interest in defending its actions and discrediting South Africa’s decision. Consideration of Israel’s perspective should include its longstanding conflict with Palestinian factions like Hamas.

**Fact Check**

South Africa expelling the Israeli ambassador – Verified fact. This action was officially announced by South Africa’s Department of International Relations and Cooperation and reported by various news outlets.

Israel conducting a military operation in Gaza – Verified fact. The Israeli military operation in Gaza has been widely reported by international media sources, although the specific details and extent of the operation may vary.

Israel defending its military operation as a response to Hamas rocket attacks – Unconfirmed claim. While Israel has stated this reasoning, it may be subject to interpretation and debate based on differing perspectives on the conflict.

Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “South Africa expels Israeli envoy over ‘violations of diplomatic norms'”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.

Scroll to Top