French tech giant Capgemini has announced its decision to sell its US subsidiary that has been providing services to the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The company confirmed that it plans to divest its stake in the subsidiary following mounting pressure from advocacy groups and some of its own employees.
The subsidiary in question has been providing consulting services to ICE, which has faced criticism for its role in enforcing immigration policies under the Trump administration. Capgemini stated that the decision to sell the subsidiary aligns with its commitment to ethical business practices and respect for human rights.
Advocacy groups have welcomed the decision, with many viewing it as a step in the right direction towards corporate social responsibility. On the other hand, some employees of the subsidiary may be concerned about the potential impact on their jobs following the sale.
Capgemini has not disclosed the timeline for the sale of the subsidiary or potential buyers at this stage.
Overall, the decision by Capgemini to sell its US subsidiary working for ICE reflects the growing influence of ethical considerations on corporate decision-making processes.
Sources Analysis:
Capgemini – As the parent company, Capgemini’s statements are likely influenced by its corporate image and the increasing importance of ethical practices in the business world.
Advocacy Groups – These groups may have a bias against ICE and companies working with the agency, potentially influencing their support for Capgemini’s decision.
Employees – The employees of the subsidiary may have concerns about their job security and future prospects following the sale. Their opinions could be influenced by personal interests.
Fact Check:
Capgemini plans to sell its US subsidiary working for ICE – Verified facts; This information is based on the official statement released by Capgemini.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “French tech giant Capgemini to sell US subsidiary working for ICE”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.