Capgemini to Sell US Subsidiary Working with ICE Amid Controversy

French tech giant Capgemini has announced its decision to sell its US subsidiary that has been working with the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The move comes amid growing concerns and controversies surrounding ICE’s practices and treatment of immigrants.

The subsidiary in question, which provides IT services to ICE, has faced criticism for its involvement with the agency. Capgemini stated that the decision to sell the subsidiary aligns with its goal to focus on more sustainable and ethical projects.

Capgemini clarified that the sale of the subsidiary is part of a broader strategic review process to realign its portfolio of services. The company aims to prioritize projects that are in line with its values and ethical standards.

On the other hand, critics of ICE have welcomed Capgemini’s decision, viewing it as a step towards corporate social responsibility. Activist groups have been advocating for companies to reconsider their relationships with agencies like ICE, citing humanitarian concerns.

The sale of the subsidiary working for ICE is expected to be completed in the coming months, subject to regulatory approvals and other customary closing conditions. Capgemini has not disclosed the financial details of the transaction at this point.

The decision by Capgemini to divest its subsidiary working for ICE highlights the increasing scrutiny faced by tech companies regarding their association with government agencies involved in controversial activities.

Sources Analysis:

Capgemini – The company has a vested interest in maintaining a positive public image and showing a commitment to ethical practices.
ICE – As a government agency, ICE’s statements may be influenced by political considerations and its stance on immigration policies.
Activist Groups – These groups have a clear bias against ICE and are likely to support any actions that challenge the agency’s operations.

Fact Check:

Capgemini announced the decision to sell its US subsidiary working for ICE – Verified fact. This information is based on the official statement released by Capgemini.
The subsidiary faced criticism for its work with ICE – Unconfirmed claim. While there have been reports of criticism, the extent and nature of this criticism may vary.
The sale is part of Capgemini’s strategic review process – Verified fact. This information is based on the company’s statement regarding the sale.

Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “French tech giant Capgemini to sell US subsidiary working for ICE”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.

Scroll to Top