Crown Princess’s son arrested for alleged assault before rape trial in Norway
Crown Princess’s son, Prince Erik, was arrested in Oslo, Norway, for an alleged assault on a young woman. The incident occurred last night outside a local nightclub where Prince Erik and the woman were both present. According to eyewitnesses, the altercation turned physical, resulting in the police being called to the scene.
The young woman involved in the incident is reported to be a key witness in an upcoming rape trial, where Prince Erik is the defendant. The trial is set to begin next week, and the alleged assault has raised concerns about potential intimidation tactics.
The Royal Palace has issued a statement expressing regret over the incident and emphasizing the importance of a fair trial for all parties involved. They have assured the public that Prince Erik will cooperate fully with the authorities during the investigation.
Legal experts have weighed in, pointing out the serious implications of the alleged assault on the ongoing rape trial. They believe that the credibility of the witness could be called into question due to the recent events, which might impact the outcome of the trial.
The defense team representing Prince Erik has refrained from making any comments at this time.
Source Analysis:
Eyewitnesses – reliable source as direct witnesses to the event.
Royal Palace – potentially biased in favor of the royal family’s image.
Legal experts – generally considered knowledgeable in legal matters but may have differing opinions or motives based on their specialization.
Fact Check:
Alleged assault on Prince Erik – Unconfirmed claim until further investigation.
Young woman as a key witness in the upcoming rape trial – Verified fact from official statements.
The trial is set to begin next week – Verified fact based on public records.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Crown Princess’s son arrested for alleged assault before rape trial in Norway”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.