Norway police investigate diplomat over Epstein links
Norwegian police have launched an investigation into a senior diplomat suspected of having ties to the late American financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The diplomat, who has not been publicly named, is currently serving at Norway’s embassy in Paris.
The investigation stems from allegations that the diplomat had a close relationship with Epstein and may have been involved in illegal activities linked to the sex offender. Norwegian authorities have stated that they take these allegations seriously and are committed to fully investigating the matter.
The diplomat in question has denied any wrongdoing and has expressed willingness to cooperate with the investigation. The Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs has announced that the diplomat will be recalled from their position in Paris pending the outcome of the investigation.
Epstein, who died in a New York jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges, had connections to numerous high-profile individuals from around the world. His case has continued to reverberate, with investigations ongoing into his alleged sex trafficking network and those who may have been complicit in his crimes.
The Norwegian police’s inquiry into the diplomat underscores the international scope of the Epstein case and the ongoing efforts to uncover the full extent of his criminal activities and connections.
Sources Analysis:
Norwegian Police – The Norwegian police are a reliable source in this context, with a duty to investigate potential criminal activities.
Diplomat – The diplomat’s statements should be viewed with caution, as they have a personal interest in denying any wrongdoing.
Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs – While having an interest in maintaining the reputation of its diplomats, the ministry is likely providing accurate information regarding the situation.
Fact Check:
The investigation into the diplomat’s ties to Epstein – Verified fact. The Norwegian police have confirmed the investigation.
The diplomat’s denial of wrongdoing – Unconfirmed claim. It is based on the diplomat’s statement.
Recall of the diplomat from their position in Paris – Verified fact. The Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs has announced the recall.
Epstein’s connections to high-profile individuals – Verified fact. Epstein’s extensive network of contacts is a matter of public record.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Norway police investigate diplomat over Epstein links”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.