ByteDance to Restrict AI Video App Lasso After Disney Legal Challenge

ByteDance to curb AI video app after Disney legal threat

ByteDance, the Chinese tech company behind the popular video-sharing app TikTok, has announced its decision to curb the development of its AI-based video app, Lasso, following legal threats from entertainment giant Disney. The move comes after Disney raised concerns about potential copyright infringement and misuse of its intellectual property on the platform.

ByteDance launched Lasso in 2018 as a direct competitor to TikTok, aiming to attract a younger audience with short-form videos. However, Disney recently took issue with the app’s algorithms, which reportedly allowed users to create deepfake videos using characters from Disney movies without proper authorization.

In response to Disney’s legal pressure, ByteDance has stated that it will implement stricter controls and monitoring mechanisms on the Lasso platform to prevent the unauthorized use of Disney’s copyrighted content. The company emphasized its commitment to upholding intellectual property rights and respecting the concerns of content creators and rights holders.

Disney, on the other hand, has underscored the importance of protecting its iconic characters and stories from potential misuse in the digital landscape. The entertainment behemoth has expressed willingness to take further legal action if ByteDance fails to address the copyright issues effectively on the Lasso app.

The clash between ByteDance and Disney highlights the challenges posed by AI technology in the realm of content creation and intellectual property protection. As tech companies continue to innovate in the video-sharing space, navigating the delicate balance between creative expression and copyright compliance remains a pressing concern for industry stakeholders.

Sources Analysis:

ByteDance – The company has a history of being involved in legal disputes over intellectual property rights. Its primary interest lies in maintaining a positive reputation and avoiding legal ramifications.

Disney – As a major player in the entertainment industry, Disney has a vested interest in protecting its valuable intellectual property from unauthorized use. The company is known for its vigorous defense of copyright and trademarks.

Fact Check:

ByteDance announced its decision to curb the development of Lasso – Verified fact. This information is based on ByteDance’s official statement regarding the future of the Lasso app.

Disney raised concerns about potential copyright infringement on the Lasso platform – Verified fact. This information is derived from public statements made by Disney representatives regarding their legal threat to ByteDance.

Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “ByteDance to curb AI video app after Disney legal threat”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.

Scroll to Top