A woman has been accused of allegedly using the AI language model ChatGPT to plan drug-related murders. The incident occurred in Seattle, Washington, and came to light during a routine monitoring of online activities by the local cybercrime unit. The woman involved, who has not been named by the authorities pending further investigation, reportedly used the chatbot to discuss and strategize the execution of drug-related killings.
Authorities have stated that the woman engaged with the AI chatbot over a period of several weeks, using it to create detailed plans for multiple murders. It is believed that the intended victims were individuals involved in a rival drug cartel. The Seattle Police Department has underlined that this case highlights the concerning and evolving ways in which technology can be misused for criminal purposes.
The motive behind the alleged use of ChatGPT for planning these crimes remains unclear at this stage of the investigation. The authorities are working to analyze the digital evidence seized from the woman’s electronic devices to build a solid case against her. The accused is currently in custody pending formal charges, which are expected to include conspiracy to commit murder and related offenses.
ChatGPT’s parent company, OpenAI, has not yet released a statement regarding this incident.
The case has raised questions about the ethical implications of using AI language models for potentially illegal activities, emphasizing the need for robust safeguards and monitoring mechanisms to prevent such misuse in the future.
Sources Analysis:
Authorities – The local cybercrime unit and the Seattle Police Department have no known biases in this situation and aim to uphold the law and ensure public safety.
OpenAI – As the parent company of ChatGPT, OpenAI may have an interest in downplaying any negative associations with their product.
Fact Check:
The incident occurring in Seattle, Washington – Verified fact. This information can be confirmed through official police reports or statements.
The woman using ChatGPT to plan drug-related murders – Unconfirmed claim. This detail likely comes from official sources but has not been proven in court.
The motive behind the alleged use of ChatGPT – Statement that cannot be independently verified. Motives can be complex and may not be definitively proven.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Woman accused of using ChatGPT to plan drug murders”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.