Sudan Criticizes Uganda for Hosting RSF Commander Lt. Gen. Dagalo

Sudan has criticized Uganda for hosting the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) paramilitary commander Lt. Gen. Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, known as Hemedti. The RSF, a Sudanese paramilitary group, has faced allegations of human rights abuses in Sudan, including during the Darfur conflict. Lt. Gen. Dagalo’s visit to Uganda raised concerns in Sudan and drew condemnation from the Sudanese government.

The Sudanese Foreign Ministry described Uganda’s hosting of Dagalo as an “affront to the Sudanese people and an attack on their dignity.” Sudan called on Uganda to hand over Dagalo to face justice for his alleged crimes. Uganda, on the other hand, defended the visit, stating that it was part of regional security cooperation efforts.

Lt. Gen. Dagalo, who also serves as the deputy head of Sudan’s Transitional Military Council, was in Uganda to discuss regional security issues with Ugandan officials. The meeting between Dagalo and Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni was seen as an attempt to strengthen security cooperation between the two countries.

The presence of Lt. Gen. Dagalo in Uganda has reignited debates about accountability for alleged human rights violations committed by the RSF in Sudan. Rights groups have long called for investigations into the RSF’s actions during the Darfur conflict and other operations.

The situation has highlighted the complex regional dynamics and the challenges of balancing security concerns with accountability for alleged human rights abuses. It remains to be seen how Sudan, Uganda, and the international community will navigate these sensitive issues moving forward.

Sources Analysis:

Sudanese Foreign Ministry – The Sudanese government has a vested interest in advocating for the extradition of Lt. Gen. Dagalo and may present a biased view of the situation.

Ugandan Government – Uganda has its interests in regional security cooperation and may downplay concerns about hosting Lt. Gen. Dagalo.

Fact Check:

Sudan criticized Uganda for hosting Lt. Gen. Dagalo – Verified fact; Sudanese Foreign Ministry statement
Lt. Gen. Dagalo visited Uganda to discuss regional security issues – Verified fact; official sources from both countries confirm this
Rights groups have called for investigations into alleged human rights abuses by the RSF – Verified fact; documented calls from various human rights organizations.

Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “‘Affront to humanity’: Sudan slams Uganda for hosting RSF paramilitary boss”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.

Scroll to Top