Court orders Bolsonaro to wear ankle tag and puts him under curfew
Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro has been ordered by the Federal Supreme Court to wear an ankle tag and abide by a curfew after being found guilty of violating COVID-19 protocols. The court’s decision came after Bolsonaro attended public events without wearing a mask and disregarding social distancing measures.
The ruling states that Bolsonaro must wear the ankle tag at all times and remain at his official residence between 10 p.m. and 6 a.m. The court justified its decision by emphasizing the importance of public officials setting an example by following health guidelines during the pandemic.
In response to the court’s ruling, Bolsonaro has expressed dissatisfaction, arguing that the measures infringe on his personal freedom. He has vowed to appeal the decision and continue his public engagements without restrictions.
The court’s decision has sparked mixed reactions among the Brazilian population, with some supporting the enforcement of COVID-19 measures on public officials, while others view it as an overreach of judicial power. The case has also reignited debates about the government’s handling of the pandemic and the president’s stance on health protocols.
Bolsonaro’s legal team has not issued an official statement following the court order, but they are expected to challenge the ruling through the appropriate legal channels.
The court’s decision to impose restrictions on Bolsonaro is a significant development in Brazilian politics, highlighting the ongoing tensions between the executive and judicial branches in the country.
Sources Analysis:
Federal Supreme Court – The Supreme Court in Brazil has a history of rulings related to COVID-19 measures and has been involved in several high-profile cases against government officials. Its interest lies in upholding the rule of law and ensuring compliance with health regulations.
Jair Bolsonaro – As the subject of the court order, Bolsonaro is directly involved in this situation. His interest lies in challenging the restrictions imposed on him and defending his actions regarding COVID-19 protocols.
Fact Check:
The court ordered Bolsonaro to wear an ankle tag and abide by a curfew – Verified facts. This information is based on the official ruling from the Federal Supreme Court.
Bolsonaro expressed dissatisfaction with the court’s decision – Verified facts. Bolsonaro’s response has been widely reported in the media.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Court orders Bolsonaro to wear ankle tag and puts him under curfew”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.