HMRC using AI to scour suspected tax cheats’ social media
The HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) in the UK has reportedly started using Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology to scan through social media accounts of suspected tax evaders. The move aims to gather additional information about individuals or businesses who may be underpaying taxes by examining their online presence for any hints of undeclared income or assets.
The initiative, which began recently, involves algorithms that can analyze vast amounts of data from various social media platforms to identify potential leads for further investigation. HMRC believes that this approach could help them uncover tax fraud more effectively by leveraging the wealth of digital information available online.
While the tax agency has not disclosed specific details about the scale or results of this new strategy, it has emphasized that the use of AI in tax compliance is part of its broader efforts to combat tax evasion and ensure everyone pays their fair share. HMRC has stated that the technology is being used lawfully and within the bounds of data protection regulations to target only those individuals or businesses suspected of tax irregularities.
On the other hand, privacy advocates have raised concerns about the potential implications of using AI to monitor people’s social media activities for tax enforcement purposes. They argue that such practices could infringe on individuals’ privacy rights and lead to unwarranted surveillance.
As of now, HMRC has not revealed the specific AI tools or methods being employed in this initiative, nor has it disclosed the criteria used to select which social media accounts to scrutinize. The tax agency has assured the public that any information gathered through this process will be handled in accordance with the law and with due regard to individuals’ privacy rights.
Overall, the use of AI by HMRC to scan suspected tax cheats’ social media represents a novel approach to tax compliance enforcement that raises both potential benefits in terms of improved detection of tax evasion and concerns regarding privacy and data protection.
Sources Analysis:
HMRC – The tax agency is directly involved in the use of AI for scanning social media and has a clear interest in identifying tax evaders through this technological approach.
Privacy advocates – Advocates are likely to have a bias towards protecting individuals’ privacy rights and may have concerns about potential surveillance and data privacy violations.
Fact Check:
The use of AI by HMRC to scour social media for suspected tax evasion – Verified facts; HMRC has confirmed the use of AI for this purpose.
Privacy advocates raising concerns about privacy implications – Unconfirmed claims; while it is likely that privacy advocates are expressing concerns, the extent and details of their objections are not specified in the article.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “HMRC using AI to scour suspected tax cheats’ social media”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.