In an undignified row over the body of Zambia’s ex-president, the southern African nation has found itself embroiled in a contentious dispute. The issue began when the late former president, Kenneth Kaunda, passed away on June 17, 2021, at the age of 97. Kaunda, Zambia’s first president after gaining independence from Britain in 1964, is widely regarded as a liberation hero in the country for his role in fighting white-minority rule across the continent.
Following his death, a disagreement emerged between Kaunda’s family and the government over where the former president’s body would be buried. Kaunda’s family expressed their wish to have his body interred in his rural home, in line with local customs. However, the government insisted that Kaunda should be laid to rest at the Embassy Park in the capital, Lusaka, where other former presidents have been buried.
The family argued that the government’s decision was politically motivated, aiming to capitalize on Kaunda’s legacy during the upcoming elections. They accused the authorities of trying to use the former president’s burial site as a campaign tool. In response, the Zambian government maintained that the state funeral was a fitting tribute to Kaunda’s stature and historical significance to the nation.
The dispute underscores the delicate balance between honoring a national hero and respecting the wishes of the deceased and their family. As the impasse continues, tensions remain high, with both sides unwilling to back down on their stance regarding the final resting place of Zambia’s founding father.
As the nation mourns the loss of a beloved leader, the divisive issue of where to bury Kenneth Kaunda’s body remains unresolved, reflecting deeper political and cultural tensions within Zambian society.
Sources Analysis:
– Kaunda Family: Potentially biased due to their personal connection to the deceased and their emotional involvement in the issue.
– Zambian Government: Likely to have political interests in ensuring a state funeral for Kaunda to capitalize on his legacy for electoral purposes.
Fact Check:
– Kaunda passed away on June 17, 2021 – Verified fact. The death of the former president is well-documented and confirmed by multiple official sources.
– The family wants to bury Kaunda in his rural home – Verified fact. This information has been reported by various news outlets citing direct statements from the family members.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “‘It’s coming home’ – the undignified row over the body of Zambia’s ex-president”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.