Hong Kong summons UK, Australia envoys after activists granted asylum
Hong Kong officials have summoned the envoys from the United Kingdom and Australia following their respective countries’ decisions to grant asylum to Hong Kong activists. The move comes amidst escalating tensions between Hong Kong and Western nations over Beijing’s imposition of a controversial national security law in the semi-autonomous region.
The United Kingdom recently granted asylum to a group of Hong Kong activists, including a former member of a pro-independence group, citing concerns over political persecution in Hong Kong. Australia followed suit by offering safe haven to two Hong Kong pro-democracy protesters on similar grounds.
In response, Hong Kong authorities summoned the representatives from the UK and Australia to express their strong objections to the decisions. The Hong Kong government labeled the granting of asylum as interference in China’s internal affairs and a violation of international law. They further accused the UK and Australia of harboring criminals wanted under Hong Kong law.
The UK and Australia have defended their actions, stating that they have a responsibility to uphold human rights and provide protection to those facing persecution. The move to grant asylum reflects growing international criticism of China’s crackdown on dissent in Hong Kong.
The granting of asylum to Hong Kong activists by the UK and Australia underscores the deepening rift between Western countries and China over issues of human rights and political freedoms. The situation also highlights the challenges faced by Hong Kong residents seeking to escape political persecution in the wake of the national security law.
Sources Analysis:
China Daily – The Chinese state-run newspaper has a history of promoting official Chinese government narratives and propaganda. It may have a vested interest in downplaying criticism of China’s policies towards Hong Kong.
BBC News – The British news outlet is generally considered reliable and impartial in its reporting. However, it may have a pro-Western bias, given its origins in the UK.
Fact Check:
The UK and Australia granted asylum to Hong Kong activists – Verified facts. This information can be confirmed through official statements from the respective governments.
Hong Kong accused the UK and Australia of interference in China’s internal affairs – Unconfirmed claims. This statement is based on the allegations made by Hong Kong officials and has not been independently verified.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Hong Kong summons UK, Australia envoys after activists granted asylum”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.