In a surprising turn of events, President Trump has decided to back down from imposing a 250% tariff on European Union (EU) pharmaceutical products amidst negotiations for a new trade deal between the United States and the EU. The tariff threat had initially been proposed as a retaliatory measure against what the Trump administration deemed as unfair trade practices by the EU.
The decision to forego the hefty tariff was announced during a joint press conference by U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer and EU Trade Commissioner Phil Hogan. Both parties expressed optimism about the progress made in the trade discussions and highlighted the importance of reaching a mutually beneficial agreement.
President Trump, who has been an outspoken critic of trade imbalances with the EU, made it clear that his administration’s primary goal is to secure a fair deal for American workers and businesses. By stepping back from the proposed tariff, the U.S. appears willing to show goodwill and compromise to facilitate productive negotiations.
On the other hand, the EU welcomed the U.S. decision as a positive development that could set the stage for constructive dialogue on trade issues. The EU’s stance has consistently been in favor of resolving disputes through dialogue and cooperation, rather than resorting to punitive measures.
The move to de-escalate trade tensions between the U.S. and the EU comes at a critical time when global markets are already grappling with uncertainties and disruptions caused by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Both parties seem eager to inject stability and confidence back into the international trade landscape through diplomacy and trade agreements.
Overall, the decision to backtrack on the proposed 250% tariff on EU pharmaceuticals marks a significant shift in the tone of trade negotiations between the two economic powerhouses, raising hopes for a potential breakthrough in the near future.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Trump backs down from 250% EU pharma tariff in deal”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.