The US government is considering the deportation of Kilmar Ábrego García, a Ugandan national, back to Uganda. The decision has sparked controversy and raised concerns among human rights advocates.
Ábrego García arrived in the United States in 2015 seeking asylum due to persecution he faced in Uganda based on his sexual orientation. He claimed that if he were to return to Uganda, he would face severe discrimination and violence because of his identity as a gay man.
The US government, however, is now arguing that Ábrego García’s asylum claim is fraudulent. They claim that new evidence suggests he misrepresented facts about his situation in Uganda and therefore is not eligible for asylum in the US.
Human rights organizations, on the other hand, argue that Ábrego García’s fears are legitimate given Uganda’s history of persecuting individuals based on their sexual orientation. They emphasize the need for the US to uphold its commitment to protecting refugees fleeing from persecution.
The case is now under review, and a decision on Ábrego García’s deportation has yet to be finalized. The outcome will not only impact his life but also set a precedent for how the US government handles similar asylum cases in the future.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “US government wants to deport Kilmar Ábrego García to Uganda”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.