A child sex abuse victim has pleaded with Elon Musk to remove links to explicit images of her that are circulating online. The victim, who remains anonymous, states that the images were taken when she was a minor and sexually abused. She has reached out to Musk via Twitter, asking for his help in removing any trace of the images from his platforms, including Twitter and Reddit.
It is believed that the explicit images were shared without the victim’s consent and have been widely circulated on various online platforms. The victim’s plea to Musk comes as part of a larger movement to combat the spread of non-consensual images online, also known as “revenge porn.”
Musk has not yet publicly responded to the victim’s request. However, his stance on similar issues in the past may provide insight into his potential response. In the past, Musk has shown a willingness to address concerns related to the misuse of technology and online platforms.
The victim’s motive in reaching out to Musk is clear: she is seeking assistance in removing the explicit images that continue to cause her distress and harm. By appealing to a high-profile figure like Musk, the victim is hoping to expedite the process of removing the images and preventing further dissemination.
The case highlights the ongoing challenges faced by victims of non-consensual image sharing and the difficulties in combating such violations on online platforms. It also underscores the power dynamics at play when individuals, especially those with significant influence, are called upon to intervene in such situations.
The outcome of the victim’s plea to Musk remains uncertain, but it has already sparked discussions about the responsibility of tech giants in addressing harmful content online and providing recourse for victims of online abuse.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Child sex abuse victim begs Elon Musk to remove links to her images”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.