Google has been ordered by a federal judge to pay $425 million to settle a privacy lawsuit in the United States. The case revolves around allegations that the tech giant unlawfully tracked and collected data from users of Apple’s Safari browser between June 2011 and February 2012.
The lawsuit was filed by a group of individuals and entities who claimed that Google’s actions violated federal wiretapping laws by bypassing Safari’s privacy settings and secretly gathering information about users’ internet browsing habits. This data collection was allegedly used to deliver targeted ads to Safari users.
Google has not admitted to any wrongdoing but has agreed to settle the case to avoid a lengthy and costly legal battle. In a statement, the company emphasized its commitment to user privacy and stated that it has implemented measures to prevent similar issues from happening in the future.
The settlement amount of $425 million is one of the largest ever in a privacy lawsuit and is subject to approval by the court. If approved, the funds will be distributed among the affected users who can claim a part of the settlement.
The judge’s decision to order Google to pay $425 million in this privacy lawsuit highlights the growing concerns around data privacy and the actions of tech companies in handling user information.
Sources Analysis:
Federal Judge – The judge is a neutral party in this case, responsible for interpreting the law and ensuring a fair settlement between the plaintiffs and Google.
Plaintiffs – The individuals and entities filing the lawsuit have an interest in holding Google accountable for alleged privacy violations and seeking compensation for the damages they claim to have suffered.
Google – As the defendant in the lawsuit, Google’s interest lies in resolving the case to avoid negative publicity and potential financial repercussions.
Fact Check:
Allegations of Google unlawfully tracking and collecting data – Unconfirmed claims. These allegations are at the center of the lawsuit but have not been proven in a court of law.
Settlement amount of $425 million – Verified fact. The settlement amount has been reported by multiple reputable sources covering the case.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Google told to pay $425m in privacy lawsuit”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.